📖 ABSTRACT/OVERVIEW
Corporate governance failures have historically been associated with systemic banking crises in Nigeria, as demonstrated by the 2009 banking sector consolidation crisis that required Central Bank intervention. In the post-2020 period, evolving regulatory expectations, heightened shareholder activism, and increasing complexity of financial products have renewed focus on legal risk management within commercial banks. This study assesses corporate governance practices and legal risk management frameworks in three Tier 1 Nigerian commercial banks, examining compliance with the CBN Corporate Governance Guidelines of 2014 and the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020. A professional research design was employed, incorporating structured interviews with bank legal directors, board secretaries, and compliance heads. Secondary data was drawn from CBN examination reports, Securities and Exchange Commission disclosures, and academic literature from 2020 to 2024. The findings indicate that while Tier 1 banks have sophisticated legal risk management structures, implementation gaps persist in areas of related party transaction oversight, board independence enforcement, and whistleblower protection. Digital banking expansion has introduced new categories of legal risk that existing governance frameworks do not adequately address. Recommendations include mandatory legal risk appetite statements in board governance documents, enhanced SEC enforcement of independence requirements, and obligatory legal risk training for non-executive directors. This study provides actionable governance guidance for banking legal professionals in Nigeria. Keywords: corporate governance, legal risk, commercial banks, CBN guidelines, CAMA 2020.
Need Complete Chapters of the Above Topic?
Get high-quality, Zero-AI research materials with current citations.
Request via WhatsApp 💬