📖 ABSTRACT/OVERVIEW
Public-private partnerships are a cornerstone of the Nigerian government's infrastructure delivery strategy, yet legal and contractual frameworks governing PPP transactions are fragmented across the Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission Act, the Public Procurement Act, fiscal responsibility legislation, and sector-specific statutes, creating transaction costs and investor uncertainty. This study provides a professional examination of the PPP legal framework in Nigeria, evaluating the adequacy of ICRC regulatory oversight, risk allocation principles in standard Nigerian PPP concession agreements, and lessons from completed infrastructure PPP transactions. Data were gathered through interviews with 20 PPP lawyers, ICRC officials, and infrastructure investors, supplemented by analysis of 10 completed or terminated PPP transactions in roads, ports, power, and airports from 2015 to 2023. Results indicate that risk allocation in Nigerian PPP agreements typically places excessive demand risk on private partners without adequate government payment mechanism guarantees, reducing bankability. Government obligations, including land acquisition and utility relocation, are frequently not met, leading to force majeure disputes. Renegotiation of PPP terms is common and poorly governed. The study concludes that the PPP legal framework requires a consolidated PPP Act providing a unified statutory basis, standardised risk allocation guidelines, and mandatory government obligation performance bonds. Recommendations include an ICRC Standard Form PPP Agreement for each infrastructure sector and a PPP dispute resolution mechanism separate from general commercial courts.
Keywords: public-private partnerships, ICRC, infrastructure concession, risk allocation, PPP law
Need Complete Chapters of the Above Topic?
Get high-quality, Zero-AI research materials with current citations.
Request via WhatsApp 💬