📖 ABSTRACT/OVERVIEW
This research analytically examines the human rights implications of internet shutdowns in Nigeria, situating the 2021 Twitter ban and regional network disruptions during elections and periods of civil unrest within the broader legal accountability framework for digital rights violations. Internet shutdowns, defined as intentional disruptions of internet or electronic communications by state actors, have been documented in Nigeria at both national and subnational levels in response to political protests, security operations, and electoral processes. The study draws on the UN Human Rights Committee's General Comment No. 34 on freedom of expression, the International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to Communications Surveillance, and the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights' Declaration on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa. A mixed doctrinal and empirical methodology combines legal analysis of the Nigerian Communications Act, Cybercrimes Act, and executive regulatory powers with primary data from internet shutdown monitoring platforms including NetBlocks and Access Now, supplemented by interviews with digital rights lawyers, civil society activists, and Nigerian Communications Commission officials. Findings reveal that Nigerian internet shutdowns lack statutory legal basis, are not subject to judicial authorization, and disproportionately impact civic space and economic activity. The study argues for a digital rights framework anchored in legality, necessity, and proportionality. Recommendations include a Digital Rights Act, mandatory judicial oversight for internet restrictions, and an independent digital rights ombudsman. Keywords: digital rights, internet shutdowns, freedom of expression, Twitter ban, Nigeria.
Need Complete Chapters of the Above Topic?
Get high-quality, Zero-AI research materials with current citations.
Request via WhatsApp 💬